Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

Appointment

Court
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Title
Judge
Appointed by
Ronald ReaganRepublican
Seat
TXND0702
Nominated
Jan. 29, 1986
Committee hearing
Feb. 5, 1986
Committee action
Reported (favorably)Feb. 27, 1986
Senate vote
52–42Roll Call
Confirmed
March 18, 1986
Commissioned
March 19, 1986
ABA rating
Qualified
Chief Judge from
Jan. 1, 2007until Jan. 1, 2014
Senior status
Sept. 22, 2018

Source Federal Judicial Center.

Recent judicial activity

Opinions authored and panels sat on, most recent first.

Cases

Appellate cases on which this judge sat, drawn from panel information published with each decision.

CaseNo.StatusDate
Baker Ranches, Inc. v. Burgum 24-5713 Decided Sept. 30, 2026
Ridings v. Peacehealth 24-7282 Decided Sept. 24, 2026
Courthouse News Service v. Omundson 24-6697 Decided Sept. 3, 2026
Garcia Demetrio v. Blanche 25-991 Decided July 20, 2026
United States v. Deborba 24-3304 Decided June 3, 2026
Avery v. Teksystems, Inc. 24-5810 Decided Jan. 28, 2026
Howard v. Republican National Committee 23-3826 Decided Jan. 13, 2026
Corrine Thomas v. County of Humboldt 23-15847 Decided Dec. 30, 2024
United States v. Reginald Elmore 22-16539 Decided Oct. 8, 2024
Relevant Group, LLC v. Stephen Nourmand 23-55574 Decided Sept. 5, 2024
Kimberly Marroquin v. City of Los Angeles 23-55423 Decided Aug. 27, 2024
Rana v. Jenkins 23-1827 Decided Aug. 15, 2024
Jaime Charboneau v. Tyrell Davis 20-35875 Decided Dec. 4, 2023
Swinomish Indian Tribal Cmty. v. Lummi Nation 21-35812 Decided Oct. 3, 2023
United States v. Richard Marschall 22-30048 Decided Sept. 20, 2023
Punchbowl, Inc. v. Aj Press, LLC 21-55881 Decided Sept. 1, 2023
United States v. Jason Sadler 21-30277 Decided Aug. 15, 2023
Shane Love v. Aaron Villacana 20-56003 Decided July 11, 2023
USA V. DAVID LINEHAN 21-50206 Decided Dec. 22, 2022
United States v. Alexis Jaimez 19-50253 Decided Aug. 23, 2022

Judicial writings

No writings are attributed to this judge in the ingested records.

Source Authorship is recorded only where the source data carries it. For recent Courts of Appeals opinions CourtListener frequently publishes the decision as a single document without naming the authoring judge, so an absence here means the attribution is unavailable upstream — not that the judge has written nothing.