U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jane Doe v. City of Memphis
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- June 27, 2019
- Case
- Jane Doe v. City of Memphis
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent for three reasons. First, because the majority does not accord due deference to the district court's interpretation of the facts. Second, because the majority incorrectly analyzes the Plott factors of whether Doe was dilatory and whether Doe's desired discovery would have changed the district court's ruling. And third, because the majority's instruc…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Eric L. Clay | June 27, 2019 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | June 27, 2019 |