U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Jeffery Havis
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 6, 2019
- Case
- United States v. Jeffery Havis
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. Although it is neither a legislature nor a court, the United States Sentencing Commission plays a major role in criminal sentencing. But Congress has placed careful limits on the way the Commission exercises that power. Jeffery Havis argues that the Commission stepped beyond those limits here and, as a result, he deserves to be resentenced. We agree and REVERSE…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.