U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- May 28, 2019
- Case
- Laskaris v. Fifth Third Bank (In Re Fifth Third Early Access Cash Advance Litig.)
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
LARSEN, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I join Part II of the majority opinion, which concludes that we have jurisdiction to consider the merits of this appeal. I depart, however, from my colleagues when it comes to the reading of the parties' contract. Under Ohio law, parties are free to define the terms in a contract as they see fit, even those that othe…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Richard Allen Griffin | May 28, 2019 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | May 28, 2019 |