U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Walid Jammal v. Am. Family Ins. Co.
This writing
- Type
- Dissent
- Filed
- Jan. 29, 2019
- Case
- Walid Jammal v. Am. Family Ins. Co.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
CLAY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The only issue in this interlocutory appeal is whether Plaintiffs are "employees" or "independent contractors" for purposes of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq . The majority holds th…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Danny Julian Boggs | Jan. 29, 2019 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | Jan. 29, 2019 |