U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Franklin Am. Mortg. Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of Lawrence
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Dec. 6, 2018
- Case
- Franklin Am. Mortg. Co. v. Univ. Nat'l Bank of Lawrence
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
MERRITT, Circuit Judge, concurring. I concur in the panel's approach to the indemnity aspect of this case. We conclude that "[t]he 2013 complaint was, therefore, filed well within the limitations period, regardless of whether Kansas's five-year or Tennessee's six-year limitations period applies." But we do not address whether Tennessee law recognizes a discovery rule that would toll the statute of limitations for breach of cont…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | Dec. 6, 2018 |
| Opinion | Joan Louise Larsen | Dec. 6, 2018 |