U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
David Haddad v. Randall Gregg
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- Dec. 3, 2018
- Case
- David Haddad v. Randall Gregg
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
PER CURIAM. David Haddad sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging he was terminated by his employer, the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services ("MDIFS"), for exercising his First Amendment rights. The district court granted summary judgment in…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.