U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Domenico Taglieri v. Michelle Monasky
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- Oct. 17, 2018
- Case
- Domenico Taglieri v. Michelle Monasky
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
BOGGS, Circuit Judge, concurring. I join the majority opinion and concur in its conclusion that the habitual residency inquiry is a question of fact and that the district court made no clear error in its factual findings in this case. I take issue, however, with the characterization that all Hague Convention cases are to be governed by a strict two-part test attributed to our recent case, Ahmed…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Jeffrey S. Sutton | Oct. 17, 2018 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | Oct. 17, 2018 |