U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Neil Morgan v. Fairfield Cty., Ohio
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence in part
- Filed
- Sept. 6, 2018
- Case
- Neil Morgan v. Fairfield Cty., Ohio
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
THAPAR, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. The Fourth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated." U.S. Const. amend. IV. This mandate, though seemingly straightforward, has generated a morass of legal precedent that is often…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Opinion | Martha Craig Daughtrey | Sept. 6, 2018 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | Sept. 6, 2018 |