United States v. Andrew Wright

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 24, 2026

Case

United States v. Andrew Wright

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

USCA11 Case: 23-13110 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 06/24/2026 Page: 1 of 3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13110 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANDREW WRIGHT, a.k.a. Anthony James Laycock, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 7:05-cr-00012-HL-RLH-1 ____________________ Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 23-13110 Document: 37-1 Date Filed: 06/24/2026 Page: 2 of 3 2 Opinion of the Court 23-13110 Andrew Wright, proceeding pro se, filed a construed notice of appeal on September 14, 2023. That was more than 14 years after the last docket entry in this criminal case. A jurisdictional question (“JQ”) asked the parties to address which order(s) the notice evinced an intent to appeal from. The government responds that Wright intended to appeal from the district court’s August 23, 2006 final judgment because his notice of appeal alleges error in his prosecution and conviction. It also objects to the timeliness o…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.