U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
United States v. Andrew Thompson, II
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 23, 2026
- Case
- United States v. Andrew Thompson, II
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-6811 Doc: 18 Filed: 06/23/2026 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-6811 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANDREW LEE THOMPSON, II, a/k/a Slim, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cr-00168-CMH-1; 1:22-cv- 00030-CMH) Submitted: April 14, 2026 Decided: June 23, 2026 Before NIEMEYER, QUATTLEBAUM, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andrew Lee Thompson, II, Appellant Pro Se. Tony Ray Roberts, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-6811 Doc: 18 Filed: 06/23/2026 Pg: 2 of 3 PER CURIAM: Andrew Lee Thompson, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 54…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.