U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Hara v. Netflix, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- July 28, 2025
- Case
- Hara v. Netflix, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LANCE HARA, formerly known as No. 23-3768 Vicky Vox, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-03456- Plaintiff - Appellant, RGK-AS v. NETFLIX, INC.; TITMOUSE, INC.; OPINION LOL SEND, INC.; FREMULON, LLC; UNIVERSAL TELEVISION GROUP LLC; HAZY MILLS PRODUCTIONS, INC.;…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.