U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Brayton Groth v. City of Birmingham, MI
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Danny Julian Boggs
- Filed
- March 10, 2026
- Case
- Brayton Groth v. City of Birmingham, MI
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 26a0118n.06 No. 25-1053 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Mar 10, 2026 BRAYTON JAMES GROTH, ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE v. ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN ) DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NICHOLAS HILL, SCOTT MCINTYRE, and ) RAYMOND FAES, ) OPINION Defendants-Appellants. ) Before: BOGGS, NALBANDIAN, and MATHIS, Circuit Judges. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. In this interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, Birmingham, Michigan, police officers Nicholas Hill and Raymond Faes seek review of the district court’s denial of summary judgment on their motions for qualified immunity on Brayton Groth’s § 1983 excessive-force claims against them. They also seek pendent appellate review of the denial of summary judgment on Groth’s related state-law assault-and-battery claims. Finally, Faes and Officer Scott McIntyre seek pendent appellate review of the denial of summary judgment on Groth’s state-law malicious- prosecution claim against them.1 1 The City of Birmingham and two other officers (Officers Paredes and Krumm) were parties to the suit below, but the district court dismissed…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.