U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Steve Snyder v. Village of Luckey, OH
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Jane Branstetter Stranch
- Filed
- Nov. 24, 2025
- Case
- Steve Snyder v. Village of Luckey, OH
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0540n.06 No. 24-3530 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Nov 24, 2025 KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk ) STEVE SNYDER; TIM SNYDER; T&S ) AGRIVENTURES, LLC; BETH ROSE ) REAL ESTATE AND AUCTIONS, LLC, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF v. ) OHIO ) VILLAGE OF LUCKEY, OHIO, ) OPINION ) Defendant-Appellee. ) ) Before: CLAY, GIBBONS, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges. STRANCH, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which GIBBONS, J., concurred. CLAY, J. (pp. 21–37), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Tim and Steve Snyder, through their company, T&S Agriventures (collectively, the Snyders), intended to auction several parcels of land, though the Village of Luckey publicly expressed interest in acquiring the land. The auction took place, but it did not lead to a sale above the reserve value set by the Snyders. In response, the Snyders and their auctioneer, Beth Rose Real Estate and Auctions, LLC (Rose), sued the Village under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting claims based on the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause and the Fourteenth A…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.