Amanda Caton v. Jacob Salamon

Type

Opinion

Author

Danny Julian Boggs

Filed

Oct. 10, 2025

Case

Amanda Caton v. Jacob Salamon

Case status

Decided

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0458n.06 No. 24-3850 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Oct 10, 2025 KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk ) AMANDA CATON; PATRICK CATON, ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE ) JACOB SALAMON; CITY OF LOVELAND, OH; ) SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF SHAWN PARKS, OHIO ) Defendants-Appellants. ) OPINION ) Before: BOGGS, LARSEN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-Appellees Amanda Caton and Patrick Caton bring federal civil-rights and state tort claims against Defendants-Appellants Jacob Salamon and Shawn Parks, as well as their employer, the City of Loveland, Ohio. In 2020, Salamon (an on-duty police officer) made a traffic stop of the Catons’ car, then arrested Amanda Caton for operating a vehicle while intoxicated (“OVI”). A jury later acquitted Amanda of the OVI offense at trial. After the Catons sued, the district court granted in part and denied in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment on qualified-immunity grounds. Defendants then appealed all claims on which the district court denied summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and vacate in p…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.