Supreme Court of the United States
Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- June 25, 2020
- Case
- Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice THOMAS, concurring. I join the Court's opinion, which correctly concludes that respondent's Suspension Clause argument fails because he does not seek a writ of habeas corpus. I write separately to address the original meaning of the Suspension Clause, which guarantees that "[t]he Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require i…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Lead opinion | Samuel A. Alito Jr. | June 25, 2020 |
| Opinion | Samuel A. Alito Jr. | June 25, 2020 |
| Concurrence | Clarence Thomas | June 25, 2020 |
| Concurrence | Stephen Gerald Breyer | June 25, 2020 |
| Dissent | Sonia Sotomayor | June 25, 2020 |