Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Filed
Aug. 4, 2023
Case
Robert Bugielski v. At&t Services, Inc.
Case status
Decided

Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT J. BUGIELSKI; CHAD S. No. 21-56196 SIMECEK, individually as participants in the AT and T D.C. No. Retirement Savings Plan and as a 2:17-cv-08106- representatives of all persons similarly VAP-RAO situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.; AT&T BENEFIT PLAN INVESTMENT COMMITTEE,…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)