U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Comerica Bank, Inc. v. Larry Pratt
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- May 5, 2025
- Case
- Comerica Bank, Inc. v. Larry Pratt
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0228n.06 Case No. 24-1790 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED May 05, 2025 FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk ) COMERICA BANK, INC., a Texas banking ) association, successor in interest by merger ) to Comerica Bank, a Michigan banking ) corporation, ) Plaintiff - Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ) WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LARRY F. PRATT, individually and as ) trustee of the Larry F. Pratt Living Trust, ) under agreement dated 01/11/2002, as ) amended and restated under agreement dated ) OPINION 11/18/2003, as further amended and restated ) under agreement dated 04/13/2006, and as ) further amended 07/10/2006, ) Defendant - Appellee. ) ) Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE and RITZ, Circuit Judges. RITZ, Circuit Judge. Comerica Bank seeks to enforce a guaranty agreement against Larry Pratt following a $10.5 million judgment against Comerica in Montana state court. The district court ruled that the Montana judgment did not revive Pratt’s guaranty agreement. We affirm. No. 24-1790, Comerica Bank, Inc. v. Pratt BACKGROUND I. Original loan and foreclosure A. Masters’s loan agreement …
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.