Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Eric L. Clay
Filed
March 5, 2025
Case
Jason Jones v. Fluor Facility & Plant Services
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0126n.06 No. 24-5249 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Mar 05, 2025 KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk JASON JONES, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT v. ) COURT FOR THE WESTERN ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY FLUOR FACILITY & PLANT SERVICES, ) Defendant-Appellee. ) OPINION ) Before: CLAY, WHITE, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. CLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff Jason Jones appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendant, Fluor Facility & Plant Services, on his claims of a hostile work environment based on racial discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2(a)(1) and 2000e-3(a), and the Kentucky Civil Rights Act (“KCRA”), Ky. Rev. Stat. §§ 344.040(1)(a) and 344.280(1). For the reasons set forth below, we REVERSE the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Fluor on all of Jones’ claims and REMAND this matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual History Plaintiff Jason Jones is an African American man. Defendant Fluor Facility and Plant Services hired Jones as a …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)