U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Leah Prida v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Jane Branstetter Stranch
- Filed
- Feb. 11, 2025
- Case
- Leah Prida v. Option Care Enterprises, Inc.
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0078n.06 No. 23-3936 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Feb 11, 2025 ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk LEAH PRIDA, ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OPTION CARE ENTERPRISES, INC.; ) OHIO CLINICAL SPECIALTIES, INC., ) Defendants-Appellees. ) OPINION ) Before: STRANCH, THAPAR, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Leah Prida worked at Option Care Enterprises until March 9, 2022, when she was terminated for not complying with the company’s Covid vaccination or testing policy. Prida alleges that Option Care violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Ohio state law because her termination constituted religious discrimination, failure to accommodate, and retaliation. The district court granted Option Care’s motion to dismiss. In light of the governing Rule 12(b)(6) standard of review, we REVERSE. I. BACKGROUND We construe the facts as alleged in Prida’s Amended Complaint in the light most favorable to Prida, according to our standard of review at this stage. See Bassett v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 528 F.3d 426, 430 (…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.