Renard Austin v. Michael Mosley

Type

Opinion

Author

Jane Branstetter Stranch

Filed

Feb. 10, 2025

Case

Renard Austin v. Michael Mosley

Case status

Decided

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0074n.06 No. 23-1425 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT RENARD MONTEZ AUSTIN; URSULA ) FILED COOK, ) Feb 10, 2025 ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) v. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) MICHAEL MOSLEY, THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ) MICHIGAN Defendant, ) ) OPINION CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, ) ) Defendant-Appellee. ) Before: GIBBONS, McKEAGUE, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges. JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge. Renard Montez Austin and Ursula Cook bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Detroit. The Plaintiffs seek to impose municipal liability on the City for alleged violations of their constitutional rights committed by a former employee of the Detroit Police Department, Michael Mosley. They allege that Mosley’s violative conduct was caused by the City’s deliberate failure to train and supervise its officers on proper search warrant procedures, and by the City’s custom of tolerating persistent constitutional violations by its officers. The district court granted summary judgment to the City, concluding that the evidence in the record was insufficient as a matter of law …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.