U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Sylivia Smith-Phifer v. City of Charlotte
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Author
- Julius Ness Richardson
- Filed
- Sept. 25, 2024
- Case
- Sylivia Smith-Phifer v. City of Charlotte
- Case status
- Decided
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
USCA4 Appeal: 23-2031 Doc: 41 Filed: 09/25/2024 Pg: 1 of 36 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 23-2031 SYLIVIA SMITH-PHIFER; LANCE PATTERSON, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00612-RJC-SCR) Argued: May 8, 2024 Decided: September 25, 2024 Before KING and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and Gina M. GROH, United States District Judge for the Northern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation. Vacated in part, affirmed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge Richardson wrote the opinion, in which Judges King and Groh joined. ARGUED: Tory Ian Summey, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Edward Theodore Hinson, Jr., JAMES, MCELROY & DIEHL, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Jeremy Daniel Locklear, PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Margaret Behringer Maloney, Mitchell Gene Davis, MALONEY LAW & ASSOCIATES, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. USCA4 Appeal:…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.