Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Paul Victor Niemeyer
Filed
July 16, 2024
Case
Dolores Ortega-Cordova v. Merrick Garland
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1700 Doc: 70 Filed: 07/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-1700 DOLORES ORTEGA-CORDOVA, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. ------------------------------ THE SEX WORKERS PROJECT OF THE URBAN JUSTICE CENTER, Amicus Supporting Petitioner. On Petition for Review of Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Argued: May 9, 2024 Decided: July 16, 2024 Before DIAZ, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by published opinion. Judge Niemeyer wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge Diaz and Judge Richardson joined. ARGUED: Benjamin Ross Winograd, IMMIGRANT & REFUGEE APPELLATE CENTER, LLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Petitioner. Taryn Lee Arbeiter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Aadhithi USCA4 Appeal: 22-1700 Doc: 70 Filed: 07/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 14 Padmanabhan, UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland, for Amicus Curiae. ON BRIEF: Brian P. Casson, NORTHERN VIRGINIA IMMIGRATION LAW FIRM PLLC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Walter…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)