Meta Platforms, Inc. v. FTC

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

March 29, 2024

Case

Meta Platforms, Inc. v. FTC

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-5054 September Term, 2023 1:23-cv-03562-RDM Filed On: March 29, 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc., Appellant v. Federal Trade Commission, et al., Appellees BEFORE: Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, the opposition thereto, and the reply; and the administrative stay entered on March 18, 2024, it is ORDERED that the administrative stay be dissolved. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for an injunction pending appeal be denied. Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) has not satisfied the “stringent requirements for an injunction pending appeal.” Archdiocese of Wash. v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 877 F.3d 1066, 1066 (D.C. Cir. 2017); see Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20 (2008); D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 33 (2021). For many of the reasons well explained in the district court’s thorough opinion below, see Meta Platforms, Inc. v. FTC, No. 23-cv-03562, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45452 (D.D.C. Mar. 14, 2024), Meta has not met its heavy burden of showing entitlemen…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.