Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Author
Gregory George Katsas
Filed
Sept. 22, 2023
Case
United States v. Lauren Handy
Case status
Decided

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-3143 September Term, 2023 1:22-cr-00096-CKK-1 1:22-cr-00096-CKK-10 1:22-cr-00096-CKK-8 Filed On: September 22, 2023 United States of America, Appellee v. Lauren Handy, Appellant ------------------------------ Consolidated with 23-3146, 23-3147 BEFORE: Wilkins, Katsas*, and Walker, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the motion for release pending appeal, the response thereto, and the reply, it is ORDERED that the motion be denied. The court declines to exercise its authority under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 9(a)(3) because appellant has not shown that immediate relief before resolution of her expedited appeal is warranted. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Tatiana Magruder Deputy Clerk * A statement by Circuit Judge Katsas, concurring in this order, is attached. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 23-3143 September Term, 2023 KATSAS, Circuit Judge, concurring: Lauren Handy was convicted of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act by use of force. Handy has appealed an order that she be detained …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)