Lopez v. United States

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

Dec. 28, 2022

Case

Lopez v. United States

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 22-2244 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 12/28/2022 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ARTHUR LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2022-2244 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:22-cv-00330-SSS, Judge Stephen S. Schwartz. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER The United States moves to summarily affirm the United States Court of Federal Claims’ dismissal of Arthur Lopez’s complaint seeking $440,000,000. Mr. Lopez op- poses. For the reasons below, we grant the motion and summarily affirm the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims. Case: 22-2244 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 12/28/2022 2 LOPEZ v. US In his pro se complaint, Mr. Lopez notes that he previ- ously brought suit against HSBC Bank, USA, N.A. and for- mer F.B.I. director, James Comey (alleged to be on the bank’s Board of Directors). Appx8; see Lopez v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., No. 19-cv-01816 (C.D. Cal.). He alleges that “the defendants including the Supreme Court have re- peatedly ignored Plaintiff’s ‘Taking Claims’ …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.