Benzo Rudnikas v. Nova Southeastern University, Inc.

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

Dec. 27, 2022

Case

Benzo Rudnikas v. Nova Southeastern University, Inc.

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

USCA11 Case: 21-12801 Document: 56-1 Date Filed: 12/27/2022 Page: 1 of 19 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-12801 ____________________ BENZO RUDNIKAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-25148-JEM ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-12801 Document: 56-1 Date Filed: 12/27/2022 Page: 2 of 19 2 Opinion of the Court 21-12801 Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, ROSENBAUM, and MARCUS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Benzo Rudnikas, a law student at Nova Southeastern Uni- versity, sought (and was denied) accommodations for his disability. He sued the school. While litigation was pending, Rudnikas was suspended for violating the Code of Conduct and then dismissed for falling below the required minimum grade-point average (“GPA”). He moved for a preliminary injunction to reverse his sus- pension and remove a failing grade, alleging that the school had retaliated against him for seeking accommodations and filing a law- suit. The district court denied …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.