Mbonifor v. Garland

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

Dec. 9, 2022

Case

Mbonifor v. Garland

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 21-60114 Document: 00516573244 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/09/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED December 9, 2022 No. 21-60114 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Gladys Besi Mbonifor, Petitioner, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Agency No. A205 102 689 Before Higginbotham, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Gladys Besi Mbonifor, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions this court for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. She argues that the BIA’s decision to deny her motion to reopen, in which she contended that she established changed country conditions in Cameroon since her original * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 21-60114 Document: 00516573244 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2022 No. 21-60114 order of removal in 2013, was arbitrary and unsupported by the record. Mbonifor, who identifies as an Anglophone, submitted a number of reports, articles, and anecdotes concerning civil unrest between A…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.