U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Javier Lorenzo-Calmo v. Merrick Garland
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 22, 2022
- Case
- Javier Lorenzo-Calmo v. Merrick Garland
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAVIER LORENZO-CALMO, No. 20-72318 Petitioner, Agency No. A208-193-921 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 10, 2021** Pasadena, California Before: BERZON and BEA, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge. Javier Lorenzo Calmo petitions for review of his removal order. The BIA reached three issues in this case: 1) for asylum and withholding of removal relief, * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. whether Lorenzo Calmo showed a nexus between his persecution and his religion, in particular his role as a Catholic preacher; 2) for asylum and withholding of removal relief, whether he showed past persecution bas…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.