United States v. Pulido-Yanez

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 22, 2022

Case

United States v. Pulido-Yanez

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 21-40859 Document: 00516366427 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 22, 2022 No. 21-40859 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Othoniel Ivan Pulido-Yanez, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CR-1508-1 Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Othoniel Ivan Pulido-Yanez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pulido-Yanez has not filed a response. * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-40859 Document: 00516366427 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/22/2022 No. 21-40859 We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s as…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.