U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thomas v. N.Y.C. Dep't Of. Educ.
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 22, 2022
- Case
- Thomas v. N.Y.C. Dep't Of. Educ.
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
21-1799-cv Thomas v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of. Educ. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party must cite either the Federal Appendix or an electronic database (with the notation “summary order”). A party citing a summary order must serve a copy of it on any party not represented by counsel. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 22nd day of June, two thousand twenty-two. PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, MICHAEL H. PARK, MYRNA PÉREZ, Circuit Judges. _____________________________________ ANNA-MARIA THOMAS, ED. D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 21-1799-cv NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, FKA Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, JOEL I. KLEIN, Individually and as Chancellor of the City School District…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.