Supreme Court of the United States
County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
This writing
- Type
- Concurrence
- Filed
- April 23, 2020
- Case
- County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Justice KAVANAUGH, concurring. I join the Court's opinion in full. I write separately to emphasize three points. First, the Court's interpretation of the Clean Water Act regarding pollution "from" point sources adheres to the interpretation set forth in Justice Scalia's plurality opinion in Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.
Other writings in this case
| Type | Author | Filed |
|---|---|---|
| Lead opinion | Stephen Gerald Breyer | April 23, 2020 |
| Opinion | Stephen Gerald Breyer | April 23, 2020 |
| Lead opinion | Not attributed | April 23, 2020 |
| Concurrence | Not attributed | April 23, 2020 |
| Dissent | Clarence Thomas | April 23, 2020 |
| Dissent | Samuel A. Alito Jr. | April 23, 2020 |