U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
German Herrera Lopez v. Merrick Garland
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 22, 2022
- Case
- German Herrera Lopez v. Merrick Garland
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GERMAN HERRERA LOPEZ, No. 19-73014 Petitioner, Agency No. A201-174-142 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 17, 2022** San Francisco, California Before: S.R. THOMAS, BEA, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. German Herrera Lopez petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order dismissing his appeal from the denial by an immigration judge (IJ) of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1252. We deny the petition for review. 1. Herrera Lopez’s asylum application was untimely because it was not filed within a year of his arrival in the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B); Hakeem v…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.