U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Murphy Begay
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 22, 2022
- Case
- United States v. Murphy Begay
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES, No. 19-10251 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-08107-SPL-1 v. MURPHY ALEX BEGAY, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven P. Logan, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted May 13, 2022 Pasadena, California Before: WATFORD and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and AMON,** District Judge. Concurrence by Judge FRIEDLAND, joined by Judge WATFORD Murphy Alex Begay appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial and his motion for acquittal as a matter of law, arguing that the district court’s failure to * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Carol Bagley Amon, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. suppress his pretrial statements, its decision to exclude portions of his interview with the FBI, and statements made by the government in closing infected his trial with error. We affirm. 1. The district court did n…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.