U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Heidy Martinez-Santiago v. Merrick Garland
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 22, 2022
- Case
- Heidy Martinez-Santiago v. Merrick Garland
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 22 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HEIDY JOHANA MARTINEZ- No. 15-72612 SANTIAGO; MARIO ROBERTO MARTINEZ-SANTIAGO, Agency Nos. A088-018-120 A095-931-536 Petitioners, v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 15, 2022** Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. Heidy Johana Martinez-Santiago and Mario Roberto Martinez-Santiago, natives and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decision denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We lack…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.