Cntntl Auto Sys v. Avanci, L.L.C.

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 21, 2022

Case

Cntntl Auto Sys v. Avanci, L.L.C.

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 20-11032 Document: 00516363496 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 REVISED United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2022 No. 20-11032 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Continental Automotive Systems, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus Avanci, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation; Avanci Platform International Limited, an Irish company; Nokia Corporation, a Finnish corporation; Nokia of America Corporation, a Delaware corporation; Nokia Solutions and Networks U.S., L.L.C., a Delaware corporation; Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, a Finnish corporation; Nokia Technologies Oy, a Finnish corporation; Optis UP Holdings, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation; Optis Cellular Technology, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation; Optis Wireless Technology, L.L.C., a Delaware corporation; Sharp Corporation, a Japanese corporation, Defendants—Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19-CV-2933 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Case: 20-11032 Document: 00516363496 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 No. 20-11032 Before Stewart, Ho, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Auto-…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.