Fuller v. Rabalais Oil and Gas

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 21, 2022

Case

Fuller v. Rabalais Oil and Gas

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 21-11083 Document: 00516364779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2022 No. 21-11083 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Thurman Fuller; Clara Fuller; Elizabeth Donell; Grace Fuller; Louise Sawyer; Patricia Dockery, Plaintiffs—Appellants, versus Rabalais Oil and Gas, Defendant—Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CV-297 Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* I. On March 30, 2020, seven siblings, Thurman Fuller, Clara Fuller, Grace Fuller, George Fuller, Elizabeth Donell, Louise Sawyer, and Patricia Dockery (“Plaintiffs”) sued the Rabalais Oil and Gas company (“Rabalais”) * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-11083 Document: 00516364779 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 No. 21-11083 for unpaid royalties arising from alleged drilling by Rabalais in Columbia County, Arkansas. Plaintiffs “recently discovered that they are h…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.