U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Rico Gillespie
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 21, 2022
- Case
- United States v. Rico Gillespie
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 21 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30211 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:17-cr-00062-SLG-1 v. RICO P. GILLESPIE, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 8, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Rico Gillespie appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for compassionate release from prison under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, United States v. Keller, 2 F.4th 1278, 1281 (9th Cir. 2021) (per curiam), we affirm. 1. The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Gillespie * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. had not demonstrated “extraordinary and compelling reasons” for his release based on changes to his conditions of confinement resulting from his prison’s efforts to control the spread of…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.