Valladares-Blanco v. Garland

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 21, 2022

Case

Valladares-Blanco v. Garland

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 20-60560 Document: 00516364643 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2022 No. 20-60560 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk Mauricio Humberto Valladares-Blanco, Petitioner, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A200 029 609 Before Barksdale, Willett, and Wilson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Mauricio Humberto Valladares-Blanco, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his motion to * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-60560 Document: 00516364643 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 No. 20-60560 reopen and rescind his 2005 in absentia order of removal. The motion to reopen was filed over 13 years after the order of removal. Valladares contends, inter alia: he did not receive proper notice of his remova…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.