U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Springer v. United States
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Per curiam
- Yes — no individual author
- Filed
- June 21, 2022
- Case
- Springer v. United States
- Case status
- Decided
Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
Case: 21-11248 Document: 00516364463 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 21, 2022 No. 21-11248 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Lindsey Kent Springer, #02580-063, Plaintiff—Appellant, versus United States; Mark Christian, Food and Drug Administration; Ernesto Rosales, Assistant Warden at Forrest City; Bureau of Prisons, Defendants—Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20-CV-03088-B-BH Before Clement, Ho, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Plaintiff-Appellant Lindsey Springer is a former federal inmate who alleges he was exposed to asbestos, mold, and secondhand smoke while working a prison job in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-11248 Document: 00516364463 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2022 No. 21-11248 Accordingly, he brought a Bivens action against two BOP employees in their individual capac…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.