U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pedro Abarca v. Merrick Garland
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 17, 2022
- Case
- Pedro Abarca v. Merrick Garland
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 17 2022 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PEDRO BUCIO ABARCA, No. 18-72458 Petitioner, Agency No. A087-749-599 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 14, 2022** Pasadena, California Before: RAWLINSON and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges, and SIMON,*** District Judge. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael H. Simon, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. Pedro Bucio-Abarca (Bucio-Abarca), a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ’s) negative reasonable fear determination and the IJ’s finding that Bucio-Abarca was not a credible witness. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition. We review an IJ’s negative reasonable fear determination for substantial evidence and …
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.