Kondamudi v. Garland

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 17, 2022

Case

Kondamudi v. Garland

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 20-61085 Document: 00516361136 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2022 No. 20-61085 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk Sreekumari Kondamudi; Sajeev Joseph, Petitioners, versus Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A208 775 538 BIA No. A208 775 539 Before Davis, Elrod, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Sreekumari Kondamudi and Sajeev Joseph, who are natives and citizens of India, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal from the denial of Kondamudi’s * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-61085 Document: 00516361136 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 No. 20-61085 application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Joseph, who is Kondamudi’s husband, was listed as a derivative beneficiary on Kondamud…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.