U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Shuthima Pongsai v. American Express Company
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 17, 2022
- Case
- Shuthima Pongsai v. American Express Company
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHUTHIMA PONGSAI, No. 21-55652 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 8:19-cv-01628-DOC-JDE v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellee, and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANS UNION LLC, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 8, 2022 Pasadena, California Before: M. SMITH, BADE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges. Following a jury verdict for Defendants, Plaintiff Shuthima Pongsai timely * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. appeals. She requests a new trial, challenging several evidentiary rulings, including a ruling related to the district court’s final pretrial order. We review the district court’s evidentiary rulings for an abuse of discretion. Wagner v. County of Maricopa, 747 F.3d 1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2013). We consider whether the court’s rulings, including any ruling related to the final pretri…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.