U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jarrett Carson v. Usdoa
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 17, 2022
- Case
- Jarrett Carson v. Usdoa
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JARRETT CARSON; JOSEPH No. 21-35938 LAWENDOWSKI; JOHN DOE, D.C. Nos. 3:15-cv-00071-JMK Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:15-cv-00072-JMK v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; CHRISTINE WORMUTH, Secretary of the Army, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Joshua M. Kindred, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted June 7, 2022 Anchorage, Alaska Before: HURWITZ, BRESS, and H. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Jarrett Carson, Joseph Lawendowski, and John Doe (Plaintiffs-Appellants) appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the United States Department of the Army in this Privacy Act case. See 5 U.S.C. § 522a. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1. The district court’s initial partial summary judgment decision did not constitute law of the case. Assuming without deciding that the decision conflicted with the district court’s final summary judgment decision…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.