U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jose Aldana Sosa v. Merrick Garland
This writing
- Type
- Opinion
- Filed
- June 17, 2022
- Case
- Jose Aldana Sosa v. Merrick Garland
- Case status
- Decided
Source No authoring judge could be established for this writing, either from provider metadata or from the signature line of the court's published opinion. Benchlight shows the gap rather than guessing at an author.
Opening text
The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JOSE ROBERTO ALDANA SOSA, No. 16-73875 Petitioner, Agency No. A205-476-548 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 15, 2022** San Francisco, California Before: S.R. THOMAS, GOULD, and BEA, Circuit Judges. Petitioner Jose Aldana Sosa seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of removal, asylum, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We write for the parties and assume * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). their familiarity with the facts. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review. 1. Petitioner argues that the IJ failed to make an explicit adverse credibility fi…
Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.