Demetrio Chilel v. Merrick Garland

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 17, 2022

Case

Demetrio Chilel v. Merrick Garland

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 17 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEMETRIO MARTIN CHILEL, No. 19-73090 Petitioner, Agency No. A079-020-976 v. MEMORANDUM* MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 16, 2022** San Francisco, California Before: S.R. THOMAS and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and WU,*** District Judge. Demetrio Martin Chilel, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable George H. Wu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. W…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.