Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion
Per curiam
Yes — no individual author
Filed
June 17, 2022
Case
United States v. Rivera
Case status
Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 21-50473 Document: 00516361129 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2022 No. 21-50473 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Julian Rivera, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:18-CR-283-14 Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Julian Rivera appeals the sentence imposed for his conviction of conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the written judgment conflicts with the district court’s oral pronouncement of the sentence because the written judgment contains 19 discretionary conditions of supervised release that were * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-50473 Document: 00516361129 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 No. 21-50473 not orally pronounced at sentencing. Specifically, he challenges the eighth mandatory…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.

Read the full document (court PDF)