United States v. Ortuno-Palacios

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

June 17, 2022

Case

United States v. Ortuno-Palacios

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Case: 21-11025 Document: 00516360789 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED June 17, 2022 No. 21-11025 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, versus Leonardo Ortuno-Palacios, Defendant—Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:20-CR-15-34 Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Leonardo Ortuno-Palacios has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ortuno-Palacios has not filed a response. We have reviewed * Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-11025 Document: 00516360789 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/17/2022 No. 21-11025 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.