Benchlight The federal appellate judiciary

This writing

Type
Opinion of the Court
Per curiam
Yes — no individual author
Filed
Nov. 23, 2011
Case
Tibbs v. Virginia
Case status
Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

Opening text

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Chico Tibbs appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) action alleging that the conditions of his temporary confinement at the Arlington County Jail violated his constitutional rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Tibbs v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 1:10—cv-00782-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 16, 2011; entered June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.…

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.