United States v. Aramis Wiggins

Type

Opinion

Per curiam

Yes — no individual author

Filed

Nov. 18, 2011

Case

United States v. Aramis Wiggins

Case status

Decided

Source The opinion is per curiam: issued in the name of the court, with no individual author. This is a fact about the opinion, not missing data.

The first passage of the document, as extracted by the source provider.

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-4161 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ARAMIS GERALD WIGGINS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:10-cr-00182-FL-1) Submitted: October 19, 2011 Decided: November 18, 2011 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. J. Michael McGuinness, THE MCGUINNESS LAW FIRM, Elizabethtown, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aramis Gerald Wiggins pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to three counts of distribution of more than five grams of crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (2006). The district court sentenced Wiggins to eighty-seven months’ imprisonment on each count, to be served concurrently. Wiggins appeals. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), raising …

Source Extract supplied by CourtListener. Benchlight does not host the document — read the authoritative text in the court's own PDF.